Canada Gets Punk'd In Copenhagen: Work Of The Yes Men, Mayhap? [UPDATED]

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Canada Gets Punk'd In Copenhagen: Work Of The Yes Men, Mayhap? [UPDATED] stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-14-09 10:26 AM   |   Updated: 12-14-09 02:21 PM

What's Your Reaction?
The Yes Men

So, did you hear the one about Canada making a huge splash at the COP15 Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen by completely reversing its climate change policy and setting aggressive new carbon reduction targets?

Well, then you've heard about a high-concept prank, which seems to have been perpetrated by someone willing and capable of going to dizzying lengths to show policymakers what they should be doing to combat climate change.

We're guessing this is probably the work of the Yes Men, obviously!

This time, the world was fooled by a well-timed press release and a well-constructed facsimile of a Wall Street Journal online article.

The fun began this morning when the Yes Men put out the following release, purporting to come from the Assistant Press Secretary, of the Canadian Office of the Minister of the Environment. Here it is in full:

CANADA ANNOUNCES NEW AGENDA FOR CLIMATE AND WORLD DEVELOPMENT Plan includes stricter emissions reductions and immediate "climate debt" bailouts for most affected countries


COPENHAGEN, Denmark -- In a major development coming three days before the final round of UN climate change negotiations in Copenhagen, and responding to the recent concerns expressed by the G77 bloc of countries, Canada's Attache for Environment and Planning announced today an ambitious plan for a new climate change framework that answers vital concerns voiced by developing nations.

Dubbed "Agenda 2020," the plan sets strict new emissions-reductions guidelines for Canada and fast-tracks financing for vulnerable countries beginning in 2010.

"Today the G77 has again made their voice very clear," said Jim Prentice, Canada's Minister for the Environment. "This policy is our answer. Long in discussion, and slated for release later this week, Agenda 2020 is Canada's commitment to a science-based approach to climate change, and our way to assert our partnership with the developing world."

Story continues below
advertisement

Agenda 2020 sets binding emissions reductions targets of 40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050, in line with the recommendations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and approaching the levels demanded by the African Group (link). The plan also introduces a new instrument, known as the "Climate Debt Mechanism" (CDM), committing Canada to much-needed funding to those developing countries facing the most dire consequences of climate change. CDM payments will begin with 1% and rise to the equivalent of 5% of Canada's GDP annually by 2030.

"We believe all people will benefit from an equitable climate deal that truly energizes the world economy," said Prentice.

The initial 2010 CDM outlay (representing 1% of Canada's GDP, or $13 billion) will be allocated to the African countries for emissions-reduction strategies and alternative-energy development programs. Payments will also finance resilience-building projects in specific communities already facing the results of climate change or threatened with its most dire consequences.

The CDM is the world's first financial mechanism that truly addresses the rising costs of climate change in developing countries. It follows a November announcement from Canada and its Commonwealth partners committing $10 billion to climate change adaptation for vulnerable countries (link). By providing quick access to adaptation finance, the CDM builds on this commitment and takes the global lead in supporting vulnerable countries. CDM payments will be completely separate from pre-existing development assistance and will be considered to be payments in a balance of trade.

"Canada is taking the long view on the world economy," said Prentice. "Nobody benefits from a world in peril. Contributing to the development of other nations and taking full responsibilities for our emissions is simple Canadian good sense. We want to show the world that Canada is a leader on climate change."

The full details of the CDM framework will be released when Prime Minister Stephen Harper attends the high-level session of the Copenhagen climate talks this Wednesday.

All of that: totally fake! But it was backed up online by a story by "Gustav Rainer" at the "Wall Street Journal," which reads in part:

Canadian delegates to the United Nation Climate Summit in Copenhagen announced a significant shift in the country's climate stance today.


The announcement, in part seemingly prompted by today's walkout of the G77 bloc of nations, represents a major change in tone and substance for the large energy-producing nation. The new plan, dubbed "Agenda 2020," details an aggressive new commitment to curtailing carbon emissions, and lays out the guidelines for a new climate adaptation fund for developing nations.

"This agreement tackles the core drivers of social and ecological vulnerability," said Matthew Delane, Canada's Attache for Environment and Planning in Copenhagen. "It's nothing less than a new vision of international responsibility."

Since then, Canadian officials have been forced to walk this all back. In a press release from Frederic Baril, the actual press secretary of the Office of the Minister of the Environment, he combats the "spoof press release":

UPDATE: And now, we've been punked! This press release, which appears to walk back the original fake press release is ALSO A FAKE. This is a tangled web being woven!

Canadian Government Deplores Spoof Releases, False Hopes


OTTAWA, Ont. -- December 14, 2009 -- One hour ago, a spoof press release targeted Canada in order to generate hurtful rumors and mislead the Conference of Parties on Canada's positions on climate change, and to damage Canada's standing with the international business community.

The release, from "press@enviro-canada.ca," alleges Canada's acceptance of unrealistic emissions-reduction targets, as well as a so-called "Climate Debt Mechanism," a bilateral agreement between Canada and Africa to furnish that continent with enormous sums in "reparation" for climate damage and to "offset" adaptation.

Unfortunately, the spoof release was reported in major international outlets.

UPDATE #2: Yet another spoof press release, this one apologizing for all the confusion:

Tragic Ugandan Reaction to False "Canada" Announcement. Passionate response highlights cruelty of thoughtless pranksters


OTTAWA, Ont. -- December 14, 2009 -- We at Environment Canada wish to thank the international press community for their measured and understanding response to the hoax that struck our agency earlier this afternoon, while expressing our condolences to the Ugandan delegation who were swept up in the excitement of this false future "vision."

This sophisticated operation was reported in the Toronto Star, The Globe and Mail, and a number of other outlets as the irresponsible spoof that it was.

Environment Canada wishes to stress that the Ugandan delegation's impassioned response to the announcement is a dramatic tragedy for those who stand to suffer the most.

"It is the height of cruelty, hypocrisy, and immorality to infuse with false hopes the spirit of people who are already, and will additionally, bear the brunt of climate change's terrible human effects," said Jim Prentice, Canada's Minister for the Environment.


Signs point to the Yes Men, whose primary way of pranking-the-world-in-order-to-save-it is to pass themselves off as representatives of an organization and make big splashy announcements about major policy changes. Recently, the Yes Men posed as representatives of the United States Chamber of Commerce, and staged a press conference at which they announced that the Chamber was adopting a more progressive stance on climate change policy. The Yes Men have also previously pulled off remarkably well-built newspaper facsimiles.

Last week, the Yes Men attempted to use projectors to turn the Hopenhagen Globe that sits in the middle of Copenhagen's City Hall Square, into a massive anti-Coca Cola billboard. Their attempt was quickly ferreted out by Danish police.

The Huffington Post's Green Editor, Katherine Goldstein, who is on the ground in Copenhagen, reports that sources close to The Yes Men were acting very coy, "smiling," while saying, "Who said it was the Yes Men?"

We hope to be able to say so soon!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

So, did you hear the one about Canada making a huge splash at the COP15 Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen by completely reversing its climate change policy and setting aggressive new carbon reductio...
So, did you hear the one about Canada making a huge splash at the COP15 Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen by completely reversing its climate change policy and setting aggressive new carbon reductio...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
38
Pending Comments
4
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- New jimrs6 I'm a Fan of jimrs6 11 fans permalink

A hoax about a hoax!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 12/14/2009

I heard they're now posing as the US Congress, saying they're going to pass health care legislation that will bankrupt the US.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 12/14/2009
- MJinCanada I'm a Fan of MJinCanada 116 fans permalink

If only the Yes Men's spoof had any basis in fact.

Instead our PM is trying to be the Sarah Palin of Canada, a twit who has actually appointed his creationist buddies to posts requiring an honest acceptance, if not understanding, of real science.

Stephen Harper -- working hard for the title of Canada's worst prime minister ever.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

Now if only that 60% of Canadian voters would pick a single party we could be rid of him.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

Coalitions are perfectly legal as well.Let them form one and have Mail Boy Harper and croanies scream until they are blue.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

Me to EH! Harper at maximum has the support of 40% of Canadians. The other 60% can not stand him and want our country back. Its another thing you can blame on Bush.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 12/14/2009
- ttyy I'm a Fan of ttyy 6 fans permalink

Blame Canada!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 12/14/2009
- New JTCan I'm a Fan of JTCan 11 fans permalink

blame Harper...most Canadians are appalled by his policies.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 12/14/2009
- New Spencaa I'm a Fan of Spencaa 14 fans permalink

Yet they continue to vote him in and is winning in the polls...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 12/14/2009

One potential sign this just miiiight be the Yes Men, maybe, possibly: They posted all this stuff on their Facebook page hours ago.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 12/14/2009

This Canadian government has a lot to answer for when it comes to carbon emissions. The Alberta tar sands alone are a ecological catastrophe waiting to happen.

I wonder what all those millionaire hippies in Salt Spring Island think?

http://www.greenexplorer.ovi.com/getinspired/north-america/canada/the-alternative-bay-watch/

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 12/14/2009
- Martha12 I'm a Fan of Martha12 119 fans permalink
photo

For Canadians, petro-rage also has important
continental implications in terms of our relations
with the U.S.

In the spring of 2004, Canada surpassed
Saudi Arabia to become the largest foreign
supplier of oil to the U.S.

Given the uncertainties
of the Middle East and Venezuelan supply lines,
the U.S. steadily increased its oil imports from
Canada, facilitated in large measure by the proportional
sharing clause on energy that had been
incorporated in the North America Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA).

As a result, Canada has
become the largest foreign supplier of oil, natural
gas, electricity, and uranium for energy to the
United States.

This development, in turn, is taking
place at a time when the U.S., as the world’s
predominant economic and military superpower,
has reasserted itself with imperial characteristics
on the global scene.

In addition, this increasing
dependency on Canada to meet energy security
needs in the U.S. is rapidly depleting our conventional
reserves of oil and natural gas to the point
where our own energy security could soon be in
jeopardy.

Enter the Athabasca tar sands of northern
Alberta, the largest known hydrocarbon deposit
ever discovered so far on the planet.

http://www.tarsandswatch.org/files/Fuelling_Fortress_America-5_0.pdf

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

Since the oil produced from the tar sands is almost exclusively exported to the US, my guess is that Canada isn't the only one with "a lot to answer for". And what's your point about rich hippies anyway? Considering many donate to causes opposed to the tar sands, why are they worth a special mention?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

A few years ago I read an article about a program that had been created to help convert antiquated and dirty coal burning equipment (generators, etc) in India's largest cities. In addition to the environmental impact, there were significant health effects from the presence of so many private and industrial coal burning sources in such crowded areas. I think Canada was funding the project, which seemed like a good move, but I later found out that India was spending hundreds of millions of dollars on a space program.
India is already facing the stress of overpopulation in addition to rampant poverty and subsistence farming n many areas of the country, so it's definitely in need of international assistance. But what is the point of trying to help when they use substantial amounts of their own resources to fund a space program ? This is complete nonsense and it should be considered unacceptable that their priorities are so badly mixed up. It's bad enough that we in the US have people dying for lack of medical care and record numbers of children going hungry, but a space program in India ?!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 12/14/2009
- fcsakes I'm a Fan of fcsakes 86 fans permalink
photo

As long as Canada permits the slaughter of baby seals, they can sink as far as I'm concerned - right along with all the shallow, spoiled individuals who cannot live w/o their seal coats.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 12/14/2009
- Martha12 I'm a Fan of Martha12 119 fans permalink
photo

Yes.....that's so much worse than Americas lack of participation in reducing carbon emissions???

You must be joking...............this is about the future of our planet............baby seals are another issue entirely.

Just like the Polar bears and whales that the US is putting in danger of extinction because of .............refusing to acknowledge the extent of global warming.

By your way of thinking .............lets let the US, India and China "sink" until they clean up their carbon emissions.

You have no solutions whatsoever.........why don't you try to get congress to allow Obama to do the job he was elected to do, instead of making these ridiculous statements.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 12/14/2009

For your informartion, the slaughter of baby seals is prohibited by law in Canada since 1982. So please do not spread wrong informations about Canada. Thank you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 12/14/2009
- MJinCanada I'm a Fan of MJinCanada 116 fans permalink

"The thing about saving the world is that you invariably save the bit you are standing on." Terry Pratchett

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

Seals Sheals, if you wear leather or eat meat your just as guilty. Lobsters feel pain to baby.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 12/14/2009
- New Rizz I'm a Fan of Rizz 7 fans permalink

Carrots and Celery also feel pain.

21 said it best, "Every living thing has a soul, you just can't win."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 12/14/2009
photo

Just Say Yes to the Yes Men!

Are they getting the Nobel Peace prize yet?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 12/14/2009
- isaidit I'm a Fan of isaidit 25 fans permalink

+3 :) They mayka me smile.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 12/14/2009
- New Rizz I'm a Fan of Rizz 7 fans permalink

I'm surprised they jumped on with the carbon folks. They've seen the devastation of source pollution firsthand. You'd think they would be more in with the smart people camp.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 12/14/2009
- woodshoe I'm a Fan of woodshoe 20 fans permalink
photo

yes men are brilliant.. by always putting powerful interests in the position of re-stating their horrible edicts and denials..
luckily for all of us,.. we don't need leaders and potentates to endorse any such argeement.. more likely people will begin to gather locally all of the world and take direct action to shut down polluters..
much as "shut it down" did in denmark a few months back..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 12/14/2009
- sparky73 I'm a Fan of sparky73 30 fans permalink
photo

Instead of just piling on more money to the national debt, why don't we just ask every working American to write a check for $200 bucks to go to developing nations that need climate change $$$$.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 12/14/2009
- LootPinata I'm a Fan of LootPinata 3 fans permalink

Oh man, if Canada was ever looking for a way to show the world that we're different from the States, this is it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 12/14/2009
- Dhammi I'm a Fan of Dhammi 15 fans permalink
photo

Everything is getting wierder and wierder!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 12/14/2009
- firewmn I'm a Fan of firewmn 63 fans permalink
photo

**wierd science**

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 12/14/2009

unfortunately THIS canadian government cannot and will not be embarrassed into action ------

they have the tar sands to protect in alberta, the texas wannabees,where all the seats are held by conservatives ---

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 12/14/2009
- Salfana I'm a Fan of Salfana 8 fans permalink
photo

As far as I know environmentally, tar sands is the worse of the worse to extract petrol. Since Mr. Harper has come to power he has taken the Canadians more towards Bush policy. I follow Canadians news the journalists are still doing their job.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 12/14/2009

Not to mention this lame gov't under Harper spent more money on promoting what a good job they are doing, than actually doing a good job for Canadian....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 12/14/2009
- Martha12 I'm a Fan of Martha12 119 fans permalink
photo

Well unfortunately a PREVIOUS government locked Canada into a NAFTA agreement which forces

us to provide the US with an oil quota that necessitates the hideous tar sands. The Liberals are

satisfied with the status quo and Chretien proved that when he was in power.

The NDP, have not been elected to power in decades, we do not know if they would ever do anything about it either.:

Liberals under Jean Chrétien were elected to office in 1993 , partly on a promise to re-negotiate key labour and environmental parts of NAFTA.

An agreement was indeed struck with the Democrats under Bill Clinton that created separate side deals to address both of these concerns.

The Liberal Party of Canada is largely content with the existing agreement.

Today, the NDP argues that the FTA and its successor, NAFTA, do not, amongst other concerns, provide adequate measures to protect the labor force and to prevent big business from degrading the environment.

They have since taken the view that the two NAFTA side agreements negotiated by Chrétien and Clinton should be worked into the main body of the agreement so they can be properly enforced, which is notably the same position U.S. President Barack Obama has recently taken.

It is unclear if either of the other two major Canadian political parties would be interested in opening the agreement back up to address these concerns, but Prime Minister Stephen Harper has recently expressed his lack of interest in doing so.

Wkipedia

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 12/14/2009

We're all getting punk'd in Copenhagen.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 12/14/2009
photo

another 'useful idiot' of the corporate kleptocracy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 12/14/2009
- BOWIEMAN I'm a Fan of BOWIEMAN 9 fans permalink
photo

how true!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 12/14/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect