Last month, Nike Inc., one of the founders of a business coalition whose goal is to "pass meaningful energy and climate change legislation," resigned from the chamber's board of directors to protest its stance. But Nike said it remains a member so it can work from within to promote climate change legislation. (AP Photo/Don Ryan)

Washington » Losing key members, fending off a high-profile hoax and facing political headwinds, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce spent a record $34.7 million in the third quarter lobbying against the Obama administration's proposals to overhaul energy policy, financial regulation and health care.

The Chamber's money paid for more than a dozen lobbyists to visit Congress, the White House and agencies from Agriculture to Treasury. Most of the Chamber's positions -- free trade, unfettered credit card lending, Cash for Clunkers rebates -- enjoy broad support among the Chamber's diverse corporate members.

The Chamber's lobbying agenda encompasses virtually any issue that affects business -- so the group has a stance on virtually every issue. Debates on far-reaching effects, such as health care, often occupy the most attention. But the Chamber disclosure also shows the group devoted serious resources to issues important to a smaller number of members -- Internet taxation, immigration enforcement and forcing children to speak English.

However, on one broad issue considered critical to the Obama administration's success the Chamber's anti-regulatory postures created a rift. On the question of how to address climate change, the Chamber has seen a growing number of companies defect. They say the self-proclaimed "voice of business" doesn't speak for them when it denies global warming and lobbies against climate

Advertisement
change legislation.

Early and high-profile departures included Apple Inc., Exelon Corp., Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and the Public Service Company of New Mexico. Last week, Mohawk Fine Paper, a privately held paper manufacturer based in Cohoes, N.Y., joined them.

Chamber defenders said the companies were protecting their own economic interests and shifting with the political winds.

But George Milner, Mohawk's vice president for environmental affairs, said it hurts the company's credibility as an advocate for environmental protection when it belongs to an organization that vigorously opposes action on climate change.

A chamber spokesman didn't respond to a request for comment on Mohawk's decision.

Last month, Nike Inc., one of the founders of a business coalition whose goal is to "pass meaningful energy and climate change legislation," resigned from the chamber's board of directors to protest its stance. But Nike said it remains a member so it can work from within to promote climate change legislation.

White House officials have seized gleefully on the anti-Chamber backlash, caricaturing the group as out of touch and unable to negotiate the new political climate. The tension led some observers to question whether the Chamber's influence was waning.

Criticism of the chamber's stance on climate change took an odd turn early last week when a group of pranksters called the Yes Men staged a fake news conference, posing as chamber representatives at the National Press Club in Washington. They announced that the chamber had reversed its position on climate change and would stop lobbying against the Senate's 800-page climate bill.

In a statement denouncing the hoax, the chamber said it "believes that strong climate legislation is compatible with the goals of improving our economy and creating jobs."