UPDATE: Union organizer shouts down protesters as they block private Google shuttle

|
(45)
A Google employee shouts down a private shuttle protester on Valencia and 24th streets this morning.
Photo by Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez

Protesters blocked a private Google shuttle on Valencia street today, decrying private shuttle's use of public bus stops without paying fees or fines.

The group of 20 or so neon-yellow vested protesters called themselves the "San Francisco Displacement and Neighborhood Impact Agency." The company doesn't pay San Francisco a dime to use the Muni stops -- fines that private auto drivers pay regularly.

UPDATE 12:32pm: Various tips have streamed in that this shout-out was staged. Protest organizer Leslie Dreyer talked to us on the phone and verified that this person's identity was Max Bell Alper, a union organizer from Oakland. This person was not a Google employee, and Dreyer was not able to verify if Alper was there in the morning with the group of 20-30 protesters. The Guardian is attempting to contact Alper for comment. Dreyer said she, as an organizer, was unaware that the "performance" had been planned. We are following this as it develops.

UPDATE 1:06pm: Within an hour of our original post, the Guardian learned that Max Bell Alper, a union organizer with Unite Here Local 2850 was the man shouting down Google bus protesters earlier this morning. We asked Alper what motivated him to impersonate a Google employee.

"This is political theater to demonstrate what is happening to the city. It's about more than just the bus. These are enormous corporations that are investing in this community. These companies, like Google, should be proud of where they're from and invest in their communities," he said.

When asked if he intentiionally intended to deceive media, he replied "People are talking all over the country about what's happening in San Francisco (referring to evictions and displacement). That's the debate we need to have here. The more we talk about it, the more we think about it, the more we're going to see the tech companies need to contribute."

 Alper said that he did not intend to engage in theater before going to the protest, but when there made the decision, "spontaneously," to stage the argument. When he maintained his story that this was political theater, we again asked why he did not verify his name at the protest itself -- and only after the story blew up in national and local media.

"This was improv political theater," he said.

Original post follows:

The SFMTA has a pilot plan in the works to regulate private use of public bus stops.

Though the private shuttles were the crux of the day's protest, the heart of the fight is over gentrification. As the tech revolution in SF leads to rising rents and longtime San Franciscans are being displaced.

In the video, a union organizer who hopped off the bus shouts down Erin McElroy, staging an argument with a protester who also heads the eviction mapping project. "How long have you lived in this city?" McElroy asked him. He shouted back "Why don't you go to a city that can afford it? This is a city for the right people who can afford it. You can't afford it? You can leave. I'm sorry, get a better job."

"What kind of fucking city is this?" he shouted, and then walked off. He mentioned repeatedly that he couldn't get to work because the bus was blocked, and did exit the bus (indicated he was a Google employee), but the Guardian (nor a nearby Al Jazeera reporter) could not verify his job title or name. If anyone has any tips as to the identity of this man, please contact us at news@sfbg.com. 

(UPDATE 12:12 PM -- The Guardian amended the headline to reflect our story more accurately, that though this man exited the bus and claimed he was late for work, we have not yet verified his employment at Google)

We'll have more on this story later in the day, for now, check out footage from the protest.)

Comments

Here's one better, if you work in Mountain View, you should live in Mountain View.

Posted by James on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:07 pm

So the requirement to live in san francisco is now having a job in san francisco? If so, why not start with the bigger "problem"--the 240,000 daily bay bridge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco%E2%80%93Oakland_Bay_Bridge) and 110,000 daily golden gate bridge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Gate_Bridge) crossings? I guarantee you those are not all tourists! OR, why not just tear down the bridges?

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:50 pm

So the requirement to live in san francisco is now having a job in san francisco? If so, why not start with the bigger "problem"--the 240,000 daily bay bridge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco%E2%80%93Oakland_Bay_Bridge) and 110,000 daily golden gate bridge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Gate_Bridge) crossings? I guarantee you those are not all tourists! OR, why not just tear down the bridges?

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:53 pm
Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:13 pm

Google tried to built a mixed use housing development in Mountain View to house many of its workers who prefer a more urban lifestyle closer to work, but the city of Mountain View vetoed it. So, unless you think Google should simply stop employing so many people, the answer is that we have land use dysfunction beyond the borders of the city as well.

Living in Mountain View is hardly an option for many employees, and in fact living there often displaces lower income residents in Mountain View's older apartment buildings along California Ave / Rengstorff.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:48 pm

This is what class warfare looks like.

Posted by generic_ on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:07 pm

That Erin chick is lucky she didn't get slapped.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:09 pm

you are lucky you didn't get slapped.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:26 pm

So hitting a woman who is keeping you from getting to work is OK? I'd love to see that comment from 'guest' traced back to an IP address inside of google.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:44 pm

dangerous act, and injuries might be expected. Likewise, trying to stop people earning a living could prove hazardous.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:16 pm

Such courage. Such sacrifice. Such resolve.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:46 pm

But that didn't stop you from making a coded threat against McElroy, did it? Also, do you really think she stopped that huge shuttle bus by herself? Surprise surprise, troll commenter thinks it's cool to suggest violence against women protesters, but wouldn't dare make such a comment about a man---not even a man making horrific comments about working class San Franciscans he's displacing.

Posted by Parkwood1920 on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:41 pm

potentially confrontational situation where harm might have been done.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:20 pm

Thank you protestors! I will soon join your ranks. S.F. is a city that fights for justice, if you don't like than YOU can leave!

<3 <3

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:19 pm

Maybe some of these whiney protesters would be happier in Oakland

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:34 pm

Evidently in 2013 in order to get something to be viral you have to use actors. I don't disagree about the busses, but the obvious actor is an actor.

Posted by Rob on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:27 pm

SFBG has been had, methinks.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:18 pm

Other sources cautiously reported the altercation and noted from the start that it quite possibly could have been staged.

The shouter had apparently been interviewed by SFBG in the past and most likely knew that the SFBG 'journalists' would fall all over themselves with a rush to print the story that he had fabricated for them.

Fact checking??? For a story that fits the SFBG agenda??? Why?

SFist had pretty good reporting on the incident, it is helpful to read stuff their before turning to SFBG for the entertainment value.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:30 pm
Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:42 pm

Go live in Mountain View if you work there, oh is it too boring you dumb fuck? Don't make generations of San Franciscans pay more for you to live in a fun city. Take out all the old timers and people who have been here for ages and the fun drains out of the city and all we're left with is high rents and boring ass outsiders.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:34 pm
Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:22 pm

Yes!!! I couldn't have said it better myself!
It's a complete shame that folks who've been in San Francisco and contributed to its atmosphere can't even reap the benefits of their own cultural inputs. These techies don't enhance San Francisco's culture, they just suck the life out of it like parasites. And for those who may not have known, to live in a BMR apartment (the few that exist, and some of the only affordable options nowadays) you are required to work in SF in order to apply. The same should should go for these guys. If they want a fun and vibrant city, go create it! Don't steal it away from others!

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:41 pm
Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:45 pm

Stupid, misguided people (the protestors). The problem is not the buses or the tech companies, the problem is the constrictive building laws. The same protestors would decry new development in the city. Ask any economist - the problem is supply and demand.

What do they hope to achieve from this protest? Eviction of all tech workers from the city? Perhaps they want to shut down the mass transit options offered by these large companies, so that employees are forced to use cars, and therefore park in the city.

Posted by Guest 1 on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:34 pm

There is no room. The bus situation is ridiculous and it is the individual employees fault:

If the company you work for needs its own bus to come get your ass, you either need to buy a car (and pay to park/own it) or MOVE TO THE TOWN YOU WORK IN

Pretty fuckin simple

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:10 pm

Wait - what?! People should all buy cars instead of riding buses? That sounds like it'll really help traffic.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:47 pm

So you'd rather than 5,000 people buy cars and add to traffic on city streets? You don't think that would slow down Muni more than the occasional shared use of a bus stop? Are you high?

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:51 pm

Perhaps Google employees, who have effectively won the lottery of life should be a little more humble. Weird that someone so smart should be so confused and believe that he has earned the right to live in the city and displace others because of his good fortune and good salary. This notion that one's value to the world is measured by the size of one's bank account is utterly sociopathic.

Posted by Ed on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:38 pm

Google employees haven't won a lottery. They've educated themselves at their own expense, built experience, applied at Google and been accepted. They make decent salaries - so what? They have perks that make others jealous. So what?

If you can afford to live somewhere, you are free to do it. That's how it is. We're all free to be insensitive jerks too. This guy was a jerk, but he does have a right to live and work anywhere he's able to.

I can't afford to live in SF, so I can't live there. Do I have the right to live there? Yep, same as anyone else. It's not happening until I bring in more money. That's life.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:59 pm

BS. They are spoiled children of those who could afford to send them to the right schools, so that snobby companies like Google (which have terrible applications, because the "kids" they hire have no real wold experience or concern for end users) who only care about the snobby school you went to will give them a job pretending to be important.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:43 pm

They are blocking the street. Google should sue the city police for allowing citizens to willfully break the law.

Posted by FuckSF on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:44 pm

Ok. Right after SF sues Google for using a public city bus stop for their private busses.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:39 pm

there is no need for miscreants to get involve and disrupt peoples' lives.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:43 pm

In San Francisco every employment sector has outpaced the national average - we point toward the economy of the future. People from around the world are gravitating here in hopes of participating. Hopefully we will become a role model for success, and not of class divisions and dissatisfaction.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:50 pm

Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez didn't research the facts for this article and posted a fake story.

Please accurately reflect the true events in this video -- a protestor, Max Bell Alper, falsely impersonated a Google employee to (through deception) win favor to their cause. You didn't research the story and blindly posted defamation just to generate page views for this site.

Google is too nice to press charges for libel and slander here, though they should. They come out looking great, shame on you.

Posted by Steve H on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:52 pm

Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez didn't research the facts for this article and posted a fake story.

Please accurately reflect the true events in this video -- a protestor, Max Bell Alper, falsely impersonated a Google employee to (through deception) win favor to their cause. You didn't research the story and blindly posted defamation just to generate page views for this site.

Google is too nice to press charges for libel and slander here, though they should. They come out looking great, shame on you.

Posted by Steve H on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:52 pm

well, if you worked from home like some of us do, you wouldn't have to worry about commuting on your bus that illegally uses public facilities. get a better job where you can work from home, douchebag..

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 12:53 pm

Any chance you're going to correct the article title, video title, video description or any of the numerous other incorrect statements in the article and associated postings?

fwiw, I'd suggest: "Professional agitator pretending to be Google employee gets in fake argument with other protestors"

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:00 pm

and this my friends is how we do it in San Francisco.. get used to it, for we are coming, we will rise up against the ignorance and the greed......
Wow this disgusting human in the video, he just said it all. "I can afford to pay my rent, if you can't afford to pay yours then move to another city" Well guess what we are coming for you Mr I can pay my rent.

Posted by Veti on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:02 pm

Are you another actor? Dramatizing the situation? Creating illusions that manipulate emotions?

Go join the circus.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:41 pm

Very interesting to watch this conflict (speaking about the general conflict between new tech workers and more established residents) as an outsider. I'm struck by the tech worker's lack of empathy and humility. But I also wonder, is this the right path towards resolution from the protesters?

After having read a great article (http://eamonka.com/2013/11/01/some-troubling-demographic-facts-about-san...) I find it interesting that these protests are only now happening. It seems as though the african-american community in San Francisco has been marginalized since the 1980's. Also, I'm not sure "gentrification" is even the correct term for what's happening now, as most of the people losing their housing to tech workers are actually white (and widely middle class).

Guess I'm just glad to live in Portland...

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:12 pm

Yup, I bet we're not going to get much more coverage about this from the SFBG since it doesn't fit their narrative. Probably just a meek retraction buried deep inside (look at how lamely they "fixed" the headline).

Good job protestors. In 2 minutes you made Google look great and yourselves look super petty.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:14 pm

Yup, I bet we're not going to get much more coverage about this from the SFBG since it doesn't fit their narrative. Probably just a meek retraction buried deep inside (look at how lamely they "fixed" the headline). Your headline still implies he had something to do with Google, whereas he was actually trespassing.

Good job protestors. In 2 minutes you made Google look great and yourselves look super petty.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:19 pm

Progressives who are live and let live should run the city so that we know who to hate.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:31 pm

Arrest the bus blockers and charge them with kidnaping

Posted by Claptrap on Dec. 09, 2013 @ 1:38 pm

Post new comment