Saturday, November 15, 2008
AMERICAN POLITICS:
THE NEW YORK TIMES HOAX:
Moll has just received the following from the Bureau of Public Secrets. Great move, and the BOP's comments say how this is related to the concept of "detournement", popularized by the situationsists.
Too bad that more of this sort of thing isn't done. It's a few light
years ahead of the "strategy" of petty vandalism and set piece riot so
beloved of the worst parts of the American anarchist movement and so
glorified by some who are old enough to know better.
.................................
"New York Times" hoax:
I'm forwarding the two messages below, which I received yesterday. The fake New York Times "Special Edition" can be found at http://www.nytimes-se.com/ .
"New York Times" hoax:
I'm forwarding the two messages below, which I received yesterday. The fake New York Times "Special Edition" can be found at http://www.nytimes-se.com/ .
Regardless of critiques that might be made of the ideas in some of the
imagined stories, the perpetrators of this scandal have pulled off a
remarkable coup, a coup that may help to spread some salutary memes
regarding social change.
The social changes envisioned in some of the articles could be
accomplished even within the current social setup (in which case people
will be contrasting these possible changes with the probably very
different results of the new Democratic administration). In other
cases, notably those involving economic matters, it will be evident
that the imagined changes could not be effected under current
conditions, but would require a fundamental transformation of the whole
socio-economic
system (in which case people might start considering what sort of
transformation would be sufficient, and how such a transformation could
be brought about).
But
in both types of cases, an important first step is clearing away the
existing clouds of habit and resignation, so that people are able to
get some sense that things could be different. This "Special Edition"
coup may help to do just that. As limited as the particular "solutions"
suggested may be, they are presented with a freshness and good humor
that may provoke people to start questioning supposed inevitabilities and encourage them to take the initiative rather than to remain in panic-stricken, passive-defensive positions.
Many of you will have recognized that this Times "Special Edition" is an example of the situationist tactic of "detournement". For information on this tactic, see these two articles:
"A User's Guide to Detournement"
"The Situationists and the New Forms of Action Against Politics and Art"
Then compare and contrast the "New York Times" scandal with situationists'
notorious "Strasbourg scandal", which helped prepare the way for the
May 1968 revolt in France: "On the Poverty of Student Life"
"Our Goals and Methods in the Strasbourg Scandal"
*******************
*******************
November 12, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SPECIAL TIMES EDITION BLANKETS U.S. CITIES,
PROCLAIMS END TO WAR
* PDF:
*For video updates:
* Contact:
mail to:
Early this morning, commuters nationwide were delighted to find out
that while they were sleeping, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had
come to an end. If, that is, they happened to read a "special edition"
of today's New York
Times. In an elaborate operation six months in the planning, 1.2
million papers were printed at six different presses and driven to
prearranged pickup locations, where thousands of volunteers stood ready
to pass them out on the street.
Articles in the paper announce dozens of new initiatives including the
establishment of national health care, the abolition of corporate
lobbying, a maximum wage for C.E.O.s, and, of course, the end of the
war.
The paper, an
exact replica of The New York Times, includes International, National,
New York, and Business sections, as well as editorials, corrections,
and a number of advertisements, including a recall notice for all cars
that run on gasoline. There is also a timeline describing the gains
brought about by eight months of progressive support and pressure,
culminating in President Obama's "Yes we REALLY can" speech. (The paper is post-dated July 4, 2009.)
"It's all about how at this point, we need to push harder than ever,"said Bertha Suttner,
one of the newspaper's writers. "We've got to make sure Obama and all
the other Democrats do what we elected them to do.After eight, or maybe
twenty-eight years of hell, we need to start imagining heaven."
Not all readers reacted favorably. "The thing I disagree with is how
they did it," said Stuart Carlyle, who received a paper in Grand
Central Station while commuting to his Wall Street brokerage. "I'm all
for freedom of speech, but they should have started their own paper."
* * *****
November 12, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
917-202-5479 /718-208-0684/ 415-533-3961
"SPECIAL" NEW YORK TIMES BLANKETS CITIES WITH MESSAGE OF HOPE AND CHANGE
Thousands of volunteers behind elaborate operation
* PDF:
* Ongoing video releases:
* The New York Times responds:
Hundreds of independent writers, artists, and activists are claiming
credit for an elaborate project, 6 months in the making, in which 1.2
million copies of a "special edition" of the New York Times were
distributed in cities across the U.S. by thousands of volunteers. The
papers, dated July 4th of next year, were headlined with long-awaited news: "IRAQ WAR ENDS".
The edition, which bears the same look and feel as the real deal,
includes stories describing what the future could hold: national health
care, the abolition of corporate lobbying, a maximum wage for CEOs, etc. There was also a spoof site, athttp://www.nytimes-se.com/.
"Is this true? I wish it were true!" said one reader. "It can be true, if we demand it."
"We wanted to experience what it would look like, and feel like, to
read headlines we really want to read. It's about what's possible, if
we think big and act collectively," said Steve Lambert, one of the
project's organizers and an editor of the paper.
"This election was a massive referendum on change. There's a lot of
hope in the air, but there's a lot of uncertainty too. It's up to all
of us now to make these headlines come true," said Beka Economopoulos, one of the project's organizers.
"It doesn't stop here. We gave Obama a mandate, but he'll need mandate
after mandate after mandate to do what we elected him to do. He'll need
a lot of support, and yes, a lot of pressure," said Andy Bichlbaum, another project organizer and editor of the paper.
The people behind the project are involved in a diverse range of
groups, including The Yes Men, the Anti-Advertising Agency, CODEPINK, United for Peace and Justice, Not An Alternative, May First/PeopleLink, Improv Everywhere, Evil Twin, and Cultures of Resistance.
In response to the spoof, the New York Times said only, "We are looking into it."
Alex S. Jones, former Times reporter who is an authority on the history
of the paper, says: "I would say if you've got one, hold onto it. It
will probably be a collector's item."
Labels: American politics, Bureau of Public Secrets, current events, detournement, hoaxes, New York Times Hoax, situationism, tactics, USA